Obviously this is not a copyright issue and I mentioned that experience to relate how many lost hours can go to a frivolous lawsuit or scam if somebody wants to create problems for you. I guess more explanation is needed.
Up front, I want to say that I have plenty of experience when doing accident investigations in working closely with attorneys and occasionally the FBI to take on all sorts of individuals and companies up to Boeing and Airbus. Most every accident I worked for 32 years at the NTSB ended up in some type of litigation requiring depositions. This morning I was on the phone discussing litigation related to an auto accident, so I'm not afraid of mixing it up if needed.
BUT and as a warning to others with websites, I took a photo of a wrecked airplane I was working on in Guyana and a year later used it on my website (
www.HowItBroke.com). When in Guyana, the Govt collected all investigation photos (normal process), made them open to the press, and mine was picked up by Agence France Presse, who put their AFP copyright mark on before publishing it. Other media like BBC using the image pay a small fee to AFP and yes, that really is how this all works these days. It's the top photo in this article:
The Canada-bound Fly Jamaica flight began experiencing problems shortly after take-off.
www.bbc.com
Months after I put the photo on my website I got demand letter from PicRights that I blew off. A month later they were back, stating that their attorneys, Higbee & Associates, had been engaged. I of course went to my attorney, we had to do a bunch ($$) of research, learned how the search bots worked, had back and forth letters with PicRight, etc. Long story short is that I fortunately had a good relation with the Govt agency we'd worked with in Guyana and they were willing to give me a letter asserting that THEY were the original producer and distributor of all photos related to the accident and authorized my use of the photo I'd originally taken. This is the PicRights shakedown and it is a real thing!
https://blog.engagedlegal.com/blog/is-picrights-a-scam-is-higbee-and-associates-a-scam
I'm relating this so others don't fall into the same trap and can get the idea of the time, money, and stress I lost to that bullcrap. As a pro photographer, Bolo probably already has run across this from the other end.
Getting back to this thread, the marina owner grew then sold a chain of storage facilities and has talked about how good his attorneys are in conversation. I'm sure if he filed it would become a "he said - she said" argument that never goes to trial, but only again after I'm again caught up with attorney fees and spending more time. Christian is probably right from a technical standpoint,
however this is like having the right of way when driving through an intersection and not looking for cars running a red light. The reality is that the bots DO see what is on the Ericson forum and you better have a damned good reason to piss on a rich man's foot. This is today's reality and it's not just "different strokes" or perspective.
Let's move on.