I'm a bit under the weather and sitting home researching the possibility of installing a windlass on my E38. There has been enough written and so much hyperbole with regard to anchors, rode, windlasses, etc. that it literally would fill volumes and volumes..... That said, heres my rambling thoughts:
I don't anchor that often. The reason is not that I don't trust the ground tackle, I do. What I don't trust is my back and my wife's inability to raise/handle the current ground tackle should I become incapacitated. She is much more relaxed on a rented mooring. The current setup is a 35lb CQR with 50ft of 3/8" chain and 210ft of 5/8" three strand nylon. In my limited experience with that setup its like being bolted to the seafloor, it holds extremely well.
Thoughts on rode: Choice of rode seems to dictate what style of windlass is used so I needed to "tackle" that first. I know all chain is the choice of the traditional heavy offshore cruiser. Thats great but the idea of putting 250-300lbs of chain in the bow of my E38 seems like a mistake. In doing some reading the most practical solution would be 60-75ft of chain and then three strand nylon. The idea here is the best of both worlds. The chain for heavy catenary effect, keeping the anchor dug in and for abrasion resistance. Then the nylon would work as a full-time snubber with the ability to let out more scope at will and not having to deal with the required snubber on an all-chain setup.
Windlasses: Horizontal or vertical?
It appears that horizontal models are all-chain only. They would be easier to install but the all-chain setup won't work for me. I suppose that I could haul in the line section of my line/chain rode manually and then place the chain on the gypsy and let the windlass do the last and most difficult part of the job, actually hauling the anchor/chain back aboard when it is being pulled vertically.
Vertical windlasses seem to be the perfect choice but they are more difficult to install. The other issue is to use a line/chain rode with a vertical windlass requires a line-to-chain splice around a single last link at the end of the chain. Again, doing some reading brings mixed opinions on the strength of this method.
Line-to-chain union: The accepted method for attaching a line to an anchor chain is to finish the end of the line with an eye/thimble of stainless or galvanized steel. No one seems to debate the strength of this method. The direct line-to-chain splice where the line is formed much like the eye/thimble method but much more tightly around a single link with no thimble. This is generally done to allow the splice to pass easily through a windlass. The debate rages on how strong this splice is. I did find one actual test where splices were tested to failure. The result indicated that the thimble/eye splice reduced the ultimate strength of the line to 95%. The direct splice reduced the ultimate strength to 75% or so. Still this breaking point is much higher than the stated working load of the chain, shackle, etc. and these pieces were deformed and very close to failure as well. Still, I suppose you could use a standard eye/thimble/shackle setup for ultimate strength and then stop the windlass, pass the union around the capstan/gypsy and then continue with the chain. A hassle, but do-able.
Another concern appears to be the lifespan of a splice. I found no mention of the life of the standard eye/thimble lifespan however on the Ideal windlass website they recommend renewing/redoing the direct line-to-chain splice every 50 uses. That seems a bit excessive to me. Inspect closely for sure but resplicing? Maybe once a season, or twice if you anchor all the time.
The only reason I mentioned the horizontal windlass is I was considering a manual style. Getting the line portion of the rode onboard is fairly easy. Its the chain that sucks. The manual would be cost effective and easy to install. Just a thought.
Ultimately I think it will be a vertical windlass with 75ft of 5/16"HT chain and 5/8 nylon with the direct splice. There are negatives to all setups but this one would allow my wife to handle the anchor if she had to do it alone.
Pardon my ramblings but if anyone has any other input on the topic I would love to hear it!
RT
I don't anchor that often. The reason is not that I don't trust the ground tackle, I do. What I don't trust is my back and my wife's inability to raise/handle the current ground tackle should I become incapacitated. She is much more relaxed on a rented mooring. The current setup is a 35lb CQR with 50ft of 3/8" chain and 210ft of 5/8" three strand nylon. In my limited experience with that setup its like being bolted to the seafloor, it holds extremely well.
Thoughts on rode: Choice of rode seems to dictate what style of windlass is used so I needed to "tackle" that first. I know all chain is the choice of the traditional heavy offshore cruiser. Thats great but the idea of putting 250-300lbs of chain in the bow of my E38 seems like a mistake. In doing some reading the most practical solution would be 60-75ft of chain and then three strand nylon. The idea here is the best of both worlds. The chain for heavy catenary effect, keeping the anchor dug in and for abrasion resistance. Then the nylon would work as a full-time snubber with the ability to let out more scope at will and not having to deal with the required snubber on an all-chain setup.
Windlasses: Horizontal or vertical?
It appears that horizontal models are all-chain only. They would be easier to install but the all-chain setup won't work for me. I suppose that I could haul in the line section of my line/chain rode manually and then place the chain on the gypsy and let the windlass do the last and most difficult part of the job, actually hauling the anchor/chain back aboard when it is being pulled vertically.
Vertical windlasses seem to be the perfect choice but they are more difficult to install. The other issue is to use a line/chain rode with a vertical windlass requires a line-to-chain splice around a single last link at the end of the chain. Again, doing some reading brings mixed opinions on the strength of this method.
Line-to-chain union: The accepted method for attaching a line to an anchor chain is to finish the end of the line with an eye/thimble of stainless or galvanized steel. No one seems to debate the strength of this method. The direct line-to-chain splice where the line is formed much like the eye/thimble method but much more tightly around a single link with no thimble. This is generally done to allow the splice to pass easily through a windlass. The debate rages on how strong this splice is. I did find one actual test where splices were tested to failure. The result indicated that the thimble/eye splice reduced the ultimate strength of the line to 95%. The direct splice reduced the ultimate strength to 75% or so. Still this breaking point is much higher than the stated working load of the chain, shackle, etc. and these pieces were deformed and very close to failure as well. Still, I suppose you could use a standard eye/thimble/shackle setup for ultimate strength and then stop the windlass, pass the union around the capstan/gypsy and then continue with the chain. A hassle, but do-able.
Another concern appears to be the lifespan of a splice. I found no mention of the life of the standard eye/thimble lifespan however on the Ideal windlass website they recommend renewing/redoing the direct line-to-chain splice every 50 uses. That seems a bit excessive to me. Inspect closely for sure but resplicing? Maybe once a season, or twice if you anchor all the time.
The only reason I mentioned the horizontal windlass is I was considering a manual style. Getting the line portion of the rode onboard is fairly easy. Its the chain that sucks. The manual would be cost effective and easy to install. Just a thought.
Ultimately I think it will be a vertical windlass with 75ft of 5/16"HT chain and 5/8 nylon with the direct splice. There are negatives to all setups but this one would allow my wife to handle the anchor if she had to do it alone.
Pardon my ramblings but if anyone has any other input on the topic I would love to hear it!
RT
Last edited: